10 responses to “The Writer’s Enemies”

  1. Claire

    9. The despair? Related to rage, only with less energy, and more chocolate and sitting-in-front-of-the-telly-convinced-that-it’s-the-end-of-all-your-writing-ever.

    1. Meg

      Ah yes. The despair. VERY related to rage.

  2. bookwitch

    The pets love you. That’s why.
    Blog readers are a difficult lot. The more flippant the post, the more readers.

    1. Meg

      Now you tell me. I haven’t been able to figure out a pattern at all. The weirdest most unexpected posts seem to be popular. Go figure…..

  3. Rhubarb

    This is hilarious:

    7. The book. There are days I would cheerfully chop it off at the knees and shove it in a hole if I thought I could get away with it.

    Thank you – I think having feelings like this is one of the best kept secrets of this profession, since people on the outside tend to think we work in a state of trippy magical bliss, or if not – much more romantic sounding angst.

  4. Pip

    Need a dog walker, let me know, I miss my old dog Solly (1985 – 2002 RIP) :( Pip.

    1. Meg

      OOOH. Don’t tempt me, Pip. You don’t live in Highbury, by any chance?

  5. Minnie

    Very interesting. But you missed one: noise – neighbours, street noises, building works (tick all 3 and you are fit to be tied. And, yes, I do know whereof I speak & am grinding teeth as I type).
    Blogging is weird: utterly unpredictable – unless you’re in a popular sector, ie: latest book reviews/politics/mummies/my-fabulous-vineyard or chateau or castello or croft+entire island/my brave battle against X, Y or Z [NB 'X, Y or Z' must be vile and/or evil while blogger remains completely wonderful at all times - conspicuously, even blatantly, so]. Even then, traffic varies enormously.
    I’ve seen some vg bloggers drop out because of what is essentially – and to me mystifyingly – lack of attention. And many of the more successful personal bloggers seem to have shameless manipulation down to a fine art – which, for the cynical bag tendancy (oh, all right then: me), does nothing but elicit rude words & gestures followed by rapid retreat, never to return.
    Ann/BookWitch’s point is interesting; but then, I think, people less prone to comment on posts that seem complete (author interviews, forex), which might explain more comments on less overtly serious or meaty ones.
    Finally, at risk of heresy/impertinence: blogging more but less often could be worth trying, no? Make us laugh (tick), cry (if you must, bah!) – but make us wait …?

    1. Meg

      Oh, very controversial Minnie. LESS often? I think the key to blogging is to like doing it. I like doing it, though I started because my publisher suggested it. And I like doing it in short bursts (personally, I prefer a short blog — but then I prefer short books and sentences too…) I suppose if my readership dropped off, or fell in a perfect straight slope, I’d quit. As it is, I’m going to keep going. For now…..

  6. Minnie

    ‘Controversial’, moi? Nah, don’t think so.
    But not meant to be offensive/discouraging. Do keep on keeping going – and bon courage.

Leave a Reply